Difference between revisions of "The peopling of the Philippines: theories, literature, evidence"

From IRAIA Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Evidence from archaeology, genomics, and linguistics)
(Evidence from archaeology, genomics, and linguistics)
Line 60: Line 60:
 
== Evidence from archaeology, genomics, and linguistics ==
 
== Evidence from archaeology, genomics, and linguistics ==
  
This is an example of multiple references to the same footnote.<ref name="multiple">Remember that when you refer to the same footnote multiple times, the text from the first reference is used.</ref>
+
This is an example of multiple references to the same footnote.[ref name="multiple"] Remember that when you refer to the same footnote multiple times, the text from the first reference is used.[/ref]
  
Such references are particularly useful when citing sources, if different statements come from the same source.<ref name="multiple" /> Any reused tag should not contain extra content, that will spawn an error. Only use empty tags in this role.
+
Such references are particularly useful when citing sources, if different statements come from the same source.[ref name="multiple" /] Any reused tag should not contain extra content, that will spawn an error. Only use empty tags in this role.
  
A concise way to make multiple references is to use empty ref tags, which have a slash at the end. Although this may reduce redundant work, please be aware that if a future editor removes the first reference, this will result in the loss of all references using the empty ref tags.<ref name="multiple" />
+
A concise way to make multiple references is to use empty ref tags, which have a slash at the end. Although this may reduce redundant work, please be aware that if a future editor removes the first reference, this will result in the loss of all references using the empty ref tags.[ref name="multiple" /]
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
<references />
 
<references />

Revision as of 04:45, 11 May 2019


General theory on the geological emergence of the Philippine islands

There are actually several theories on how the various geological (including tectonic and climatic) forces resulted in the emergence and shaping of the Philippine islands, as well as the time scales involved. These theories agree on some key aspects and conflict on others. For detailed explanation about particular theories and their ramifications, see: Geological development of the Philippine islands.

In general terms, however, currently there is just one comprehensive scientific theory that organizes much of the available geological evidence into one integrated whole. This theory is based on plate tectonics.


Fundamental role of plate tectonics

On vast time scales of millions of years, it is now well-established that tectonic plate movements shaped much of the geological structure that created and now underlies the Philippines. The plate tectonic reconstructions of SEARG [1] show these movements in an animated visual way that is easily understood by most people.

Sea 2001 5Ma-300x207.gif

Most geological experts are now agreed that the structure underlying the bulk of the country -- the Philippine Mobile Belt (PMB) sometimes simply called the Philippine Plate -- was created by the gradual convergence of the Philippine Sea Plate (itself just the western margin of the much bigger Pacific Plate domain) to the east, the Eurasian Plate (particularly its Sunda Block) to the west, and the Indo-Australian Plate to the south.

Eurasia-Pacific tectonic plates.png

Effect of other geological forces

On relatively shorter time scales of a million years or less, tectonic plate movements have a less dramatic impact on the configuration of the emergent archipelago. Meanwhile, on such scales, volcanism, subsidence and uplifting, and major climate changes continue to reshape particular island arcs, "land bridges", and mountain ranges whether now submerged or above sea level.

In that context, the continued movement and reshaping of the Philippine land forms on finer scales, vis-a-vis the Eurasian land mass and neighboring island arcs, have greatly affected the pattern of how the country was eventually populated by our hominin (proto-human and later fully human) ancestors after the first founding populations arrived and settled the land.

Various theories on the peopling of the Philippines have been proposed, elaborated, and criticized accordingly.


Sources

Theories on the peopling of the Philippines

Arrival or emergence of early hominin populations

Austronesian migrations (out-of-Taiwan) theory

Variations on the Austronesian theory

  • Nusan Tao (from the south)
  • Out-of-Indochina theory

Earlier theories

  • Beyer's three-migration-waves theory

Literature on prehistoric and pre-Hispanic periods

Evidence from archaeology, genomics, and linguistics

This is an example of multiple references to the same footnote.[ref name="multiple"] Remember that when you refer to the same footnote multiple times, the text from the first reference is used.[/ref]

Such references are particularly useful when citing sources, if different statements come from the same source.[ref name="multiple" /] Any reused tag should not contain extra content, that will spawn an error. Only use empty tags in this role.

A concise way to make multiple references is to use empty ref tags, which have a slash at the end. Although this may reduce redundant work, please be aware that if a future editor removes the first reference, this will result in the loss of all references using the empty ref tags.[ref name="multiple" /]

Notes

<references />